|
Citizens of Nowhere
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Ivan VejvodaNiccolo MilaneseUlrike Lunacek
|
How Europe Can Be Saved from Itself
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
How Europe Can Be Saved from Itself
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
The East/West Within
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Scott Spector
|
Jewish Cultural Innovation in Habsburg Galicia and Vienna
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Jewish Cultural Innovation in Habsburg Galicia and Vienna
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Judenplatz 1010
|
|
Lecture
|
Timothy Snyder
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
What is Political Cruelty?
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Aishwary Kumar
|
Liberalism of Fear and the Democratic Life
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
“The important point for liberalism is not so much where the line is drawn,” Judith Shklar writes in a fascinating moment in her critique of cruelty, “as that it be drawn, and that it must under no circumstances be ignored or forgotten.” Where is this line? And who lives under its ambiguous constitutionality? Neither in her 1989 theses on the “liberalism of fear” nor in her 1982 demand that liberals start “putting cruelty first” does Shklar fully pursue the consequences of this morally unforgiving yet spatially uncertain line of liberal intolerance of cruelty. And while she does starkly pose the question “what is moral cruelty?” in terms of its debilitating effect on human freedom, the limit—border—that circumscribes liberalism’s constitutional response to extreme violence continues to waver. In this paper, Aishwary Kumar offers an archeology of this vacillating, political “line” that runs through liberal resistance against cruelty. By way of exploring its global implications, he follows Shklar on the cosmopolitical path she takes, along with BR Ambedkar and Hannah Arendt, into that “most ancient,” most exemplary form of organized violence and constitutional stasis known to legal and moral philosophy: the “Indo-European caste society,” which in her later writings Shklar sometimes replaces by the adjacent term “warrior society.” Her legalism is not causal. For it is in that trans-continental tradition that a relation is forged between caste and war, and the sovereignty of the line—maryada—attains its apotheosis. Might a semblance of political courage still be retrieved from that tradition of cruelty—a modern part of which becomes genuinely “anticolonial”—and rehabilitated into norms of democratic government today?
Read more
|
Liberalism of Fear and the Democratic Life
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
“The important point for liberalism is not so much where the line is drawn,” Judith Shklar writes in a fascinating moment in her critique of cruelty, “as that it be drawn, and that it must under no circumstances be ignored or forgotten.” Where is this line? And who lives under its ambiguous constitutionality? Neither in her 1989 theses on the “liberalism of fear” nor in her 1982 demand that liberals start “putting cruelty first” does Shklar fully pursue the consequences of this morally unforgiving yet spatially uncertain line of liberal intolerance of cruelty. And while she does starkly pose the question “what is moral cruelty?” in terms of its debilitating effect on human freedom, the limit—border—that circumscribes liberalism’s constitutional response to extreme violence continues to waver. In this paper, Aishwary Kumar offers an archeology of this vacillating, political “line” that runs through liberal resistance against cruelty. By way of exploring its global implications, he follows Shklar on the cosmopolitical path she takes, along with BR Ambedkar and Hannah Arendt, into that “most ancient,” most exemplary form of organized violence and constitutional stasis known to legal and moral philosophy: the “Indo-European caste society,” which in her later writings Shklar sometimes replaces by the adjacent term “warrior society.” Her legalism is not causal. For it is in that trans-continental tradition that a relation is forged between caste and war, and the sovereignty of the line—maryada—attains its apotheosis. Might a semblance of political courage still be retrieved from that tradition of cruelty—a modern part of which becomes genuinely “anticolonial”—and rehabilitated into norms of democratic government today?
Read more
|
|
Karl Polanyi and Globalization’s Wrong Turn
|
|
Lecture
|
Ayşe ÇağlarDani Rodrik, Kari Levitt, Ayşe Buğra, Andreas Novy, Maria Vassilakou, Sigrid Stagl, Brigitte Aulenbacher
|
Speakers: Ayşe ÇağlarDani Rodrik, Kari Levitt, Ayşe Buğra, Andreas Novy, Maria Vassilakou, Sigrid Stagl, Brigitte Aulenbacher
Series: Lecture
|
Speakers: Ayşe ÇağlarDani Rodrik, Kari Levitt, Ayşe Buğra, Andreas Novy, Maria Vassilakou, Sigrid Stagl, Brigitte Aulenbacher
Series: Lecture
|
|
The New Asian Geopolitics
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Shivshankar Menon
|
Speakers: Shivshankar Menon
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Speakers: Shivshankar Menon
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
European Universities
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Christian RoglerJakub Jirsa
|
A Laboratory of Dead-End Paths
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
A Laboratory of Dead-End Paths
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Vicious and Virtuous Circles in the Rural Economy of East European Borderlands (19th-20th Century)
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Irina MarinRolf Bauer
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Imaginaries of Democracy and Dissent
|
|
Lecture
|
Jiri Priban
|
From Kelsen's Legal Normativism to Patočka's Philosophical Heresy, and Beyond
Series: Lecture
|
From Kelsen's Legal Normativism to Patočka's Philosophical Heresy, and Beyond
Series: Lecture
|
|
Workers’ Experiences of Post-Soviet Deindustrialisation
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Anastasiya RyabchukMarci Shore
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|