|
Fluid Zones of Hegemony
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarEzgican Özdemir
|
Hydro-Scales, Cartographic Rule, and Place in North Cyprus
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Hydro-Scales, Cartographic Rule, and Place in North Cyprus
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Do We Need a Post-Covid Economic Revolution?
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Albena AzmanovaDaniel Gros, Harald Oberhofer, Lisa Herzog, Eric Frey
|
Europa im Diskurs - Debating Europe
Speakers: Albena AzmanovaDaniel Gros, Harald Oberhofer, Lisa Herzog, Eric Frey
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Europa im Diskurs - Debating Europe
Speakers: Albena AzmanovaDaniel Gros, Harald Oberhofer, Lisa Herzog, Eric Frey
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Balaton. Novellen
|
|
Lecture
|
Ludger HagedornNoémi Kiss
|
Lesung und Gespräch mit Noémi Kiss
Series: Lecture
|
Lesung und Gespräch mit Noémi Kiss
Series: Lecture
|
|
Das Fremde hinter der Fremde
|
|
Lecture
|
Ludger HagedornMichael KeglerSusann Urban
|
Series: Lecture
|
Series: Lecture
|
|
Die Lieblinge der Justiz
|
|
Lecture
|
Yuri AndrukhovychCornelius Hell
|
Lesung und Gespräch mit Juri Andruchowytsch
Series: Lecture
|
Lesung und Gespräch mit Juri Andruchowytsch
Series: Lecture
|
|
In Memory of the “Festival Age” (1987–1994)
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Marci ShoreYuri Andrukhovych
|
Was it Indeed a Phenomenon?
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Was it Indeed a Phenomenon?
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Capitalism, Alone
|
|
Panels and Discussions
|
Ivan KrastevShalini RanderiaBranko Milanovic
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Forced Migration, the Antinomies of Mobility, and the Autonomy of Asylum
|
|
Seminars and Colloquia
|
Ayşe ÇağlarNicholas de Genova
|
Seminar Series on Forced Migration with Nicholas de Genova and Ayse Çağlar
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
Rather than seeing the ever more devious reaction formations of border policing and militarization, migrant detention, immigration enforcement, and deportation by state powers as if these were purely a matter of control, it is instructive to situate this economy of power in relation to the primacy, autonomy, and subjectivity of human mobility on a global (transnational, intercontinental, cross- border, postcolonial) scale. This is true, I contend, as much for refugees as for those who come to be derisively designated to be mere “migrants.” If we start from the human freedom of movement and recognize the various tactics of bordering as reaction formations, then the various tactics of border policing and forms of migration governance can be seen to introduce interruptions that temporarily immobilize and decelerate human cross-border mobilities with the aim of subjecting them to processes of surveillance and adjudication. Indeed, it is this dialectic that reconstitutes these mobilities as something that comes to be apprehensible, alternately, as “migration,” or “asylum-seeking,” or the “forced migration” of “refugees” in flight from persecution or violence – which is to say, as one or another variety of target and object of government. Yet, even under the most restricted circumstances and under considerable constraint, these human mobilities exude a substantial degree of autonomous subjectivity whereby migrants and refugees struggle to appropriate mobility. Even against the considerable forces aligned to immobilize their mobility projects, or to subject them to the stringent and exclusionary rules and constrictions of asylum, the subjective autonomy of human mobility remains an incorrigible force.
Read more
|
Seminar Series on Forced Migration with Nicholas de Genova and Ayse Çağlar
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
Rather than seeing the ever more devious reaction formations of border policing and militarization, migrant detention, immigration enforcement, and deportation by state powers as if these were purely a matter of control, it is instructive to situate this economy of power in relation to the primacy, autonomy, and subjectivity of human mobility on a global (transnational, intercontinental, cross- border, postcolonial) scale. This is true, I contend, as much for refugees as for those who come to be derisively designated to be mere “migrants.” If we start from the human freedom of movement and recognize the various tactics of bordering as reaction formations, then the various tactics of border policing and forms of migration governance can be seen to introduce interruptions that temporarily immobilize and decelerate human cross-border mobilities with the aim of subjecting them to processes of surveillance and adjudication. Indeed, it is this dialectic that reconstitutes these mobilities as something that comes to be apprehensible, alternately, as “migration,” or “asylum-seeking,” or the “forced migration” of “refugees” in flight from persecution or violence – which is to say, as one or another variety of target and object of government. Yet, even under the most restricted circumstances and under considerable constraint, these human mobilities exude a substantial degree of autonomous subjectivity whereby migrants and refugees struggle to appropriate mobility. Even against the considerable forces aligned to immobilize their mobility projects, or to subject them to the stringent and exclusionary rules and constrictions of asylum, the subjective autonomy of human mobility remains an incorrigible force.
Read more
|
|
Borders and Mobility
|
|
Lecture
|
Ranabir SamaddarNasreen Chowdhory
|
with Ranabir Samaddar and Nasreen Chowdhory
Series: Lecture
|
with Ranabir Samaddar and Nasreen Chowdhory
Series: Lecture
|
|
Capitalism on Edge
|
|
Lecture
|
Albena AzmanovaLudger HagedornWolfgang Merkel
|
How Fighting Precarity Can Achieve Radical Change Without Crisis or Utopia
Series: Lecture
|
How Fighting Precarity Can Achieve Radical Change Without Crisis or Utopia
Series: Lecture
|